Perhaps, homecomings always sit under a haze of melancholy. Bittersweet reminiscening upon memories we will never relive. As they say, you can’t go home again. But more than this everpresent truth, this year’s homecoming and the 10th anniversary of our beloved Pan-Asian American Community House (PAACH) took on special meaning and a more poignant melancholy. For those of us supposedly coming home, there was a sense of loss for what could have been, perhaps should have been, but wasn’t. A promise seemed unfulfilled.
I think alumni were surprised by some of the things that were said at the banquet on Friday night. I think it is understandable that it would be upsetting to hear that the most notable things about PAACH is napping on the couch and watching Disney movies. This might be especially upsetting for individuals who fought and worked so hard for PAACH to exist and have the programs that seem to be taken for granted today. While I can’t speak for all alumni, I write this note to express some of my own feelings about what conspired over the weekend and my feelings on the history, current state, and future of PAACH. Perhaps others can share their reflections in the comments.
At the alumni forum, early on Saturday morning, the irrepressible Hoa Duong said that hearing the words of many current students and staff made her feel “sad.” I was glad she said it. It was a noticeable presence in the room. As students were asking to make connections with alumni and learn the history so soon forgotten (through some intentional erasures), it seemed that this sadness Hoa named had also been felt on campus for sometime. But since current students knew little about what had come before and could only see the many (though not necessarily sufficient) fortunes they had in the present, how could they be sad? Certainly, there are many things to rejoice at the 10 year anniversary of PAACH. Funding seems to be a non-issue for student organizations. Asian Americans find themselves in leadership positions across campus, in the student body, administration, and tenured faculty. Penn’s Asian American community has set an example for schools throughout the East Coast as the host of two amazing ECAASU conferences in the past five years. It is no wonder that current students might take offense to alumni critiques.
What made me sad about hearing the current state of PAACH was the sense of complacency. This was highlighted in the discussions of the resource centers being moved into the basement with the impending (but likely with a long time horizon) renovation of the ARCH building. Even if the basement is the most amazing space on campus, the symbolism of putting the minority students into the basement while predominantly white (and obviously male) fraternities occupy houses on Locust Walk makes such a move utterly unacceptable. It seems that students have forgotten the power they wield (despite Kusum’s urgings) and don’t seem to see the many resources and allies they have in their arsenal. I am left wondering why PAACH programs have not expanded in the six years since I have graduated. Why do we maintain the status quo rather than push the boundaries, think outside the box?
From my vantage, this complacency stems from two places. One is the institutionalization of PAACH and the relatively stable place it currently inhabits. The other is an issue of leadership. On the first point, I don’t think the institutionalization of PAACH is a bad thing. Really, it is an inevitability if PAACH is to be sustained in the long run. And stability (and the many previously mentioned great things PAACH has going for it) should be celebrated and defended. But we can’t get too comfortable. I am a firm believer that things can always get better and that we must always be have a critical eye on the gifts we are given from the powers the be. Are things really that great? Can this improve? Are all the needs of students of color on this campus being met? And if in answering these types of questions, students find that there is nothing to fight for on campus or within the Asian American student community, it is time to look beyond ourselves, beyond campus, and think about how we can take our privilege (and as Penn students we certainly inhabit a privilege) and affect broader social change in Philadephia, Pennsylvania, the nation. I am not convinced that there is still not work to do on campus, but there is nothing stopping us, as students and alums, from working in both arenas simultaneously.
On the second point, and perhaps the more difficult one to discuss out loud, is the issue of leadership. Leaders cannot rest on their laurels and leadership must come from both students and staff. The staff of PAACH must push students not only to challenge their conceptions of identity and community, but also the assumptions that undergird the structural and institutional constraints that continue to oppress students of color on campus and people of color and minorities throughout the world (yes, even “model minorities”). Don’t get me wrong. Activism is not easy, even under the best of circumstances. You can’t force activism. It has to grow organically. But that doesn’t mean there are no ways to stimulate that growth.
And this brings me back to the title of this note: critical space. For me, the creation of PAACH and the building of programs like APALI, PEER, and CATAPULT, was not the end point. PAACH and the other resource centers were not the panacea for all the issues facing students of color on campus. Rather, PAACH was created to provide a critical space and hub for Asian American activism and community. Here, I mean critical in two way: critical as in necessary and critical in terms of analysis and critique. PAACH was to be a home that fostered the growth of a critical perspective of power and resource allocation, not just at Penn and not just for Asian Americans. The critical spaces grows, not only through the programs which hopefully instill this critical perspective in their respective curriculums, but also through casual dialogue that used to occur in the random spare moments at PAACH between classes and meetings. People walking in and out could over hear and become involved. But such conversations are difficult to have over the volume of Disney movies (which are problematic in and of themselves, are they not?). We used to come into PAACH and be able to talk about political issues, issues we were having with our respective organizations or with the administration. In my couple days hanging out at PAACH this week, I heard very little of that.
So, in the end, my melancholy is a longing for the critical space to return. I am sad because I think PAACH has lost something vital. But maybe that is not what current students want, and that is fine and fair and PAACH needs to evolve with student needs and wants. Chalk up my sentiments and those expressed by some of the other alumni to nostalgia of a past that we have moved beyond in this age of equality and post-race. If we are complacent because we have everything we can justly demand, then great. But even then, isn’t there more we could do? I hope that students are aware of what is possible beyond what they see in front of them. I hope they look at their comfortable position within the university with a critical eye. If the university prioritizes diversity and pimps the resource centers explicitly within the compact and in its fundraising efforts, do we belong in a basement?
As I said, these are just my feelings. Maybe they are outdated and can be brushed aside. Maybe I am just an alumni who should get on with my life, write a check to the university or PAACH, and let the students do what they wish. But I needed to say this on the off chance that you hadn’t heard it before. For my own peace of mind.